Examine Discovering Sufferers of Feminine Surgeons Fare Higher is Eliminated


An Elsevier journal has, for the second, eliminated a paper which discovered that the sufferers of feminine surgeons fare higher than these handled by males.

Though the journal did not present a proof for the transfer — sadly not unusual for Elsevier — a spokesman for the writer advised us that reader complaints concerning the methodology and statistics within the article prompted the motion.

The paper, which appeared final month in Surgical procedure — the official journal of the Society of University Surgeons, Central Surgical Affiliation Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons — was written by a bunch on the College of South Florida, in Tampa, led by Tara M. Barry, a basic surgical procedure resident on the establishment.

“Battle of the sexes: The impact of surgeon gender on postoperative in-hospital mortality,” is not accessible on the journal web site. Nevertheless, a conference abstract by the authors states:

Sufferers who underwent bariatric procedures, mastectomy and open cholecystectomy had decrease charges of in-hospital mortality if the surgeon was feminine whereas male surgeons didn’t have a major mortality benefit for any of the 25 procedures. Additional research analyzing nationwide information might present further perception concerning the impact of surgeon gender on affected person outcomes.

In accordance with the notice, which Elsevier types a “non permanent removing”:

The writer regrets that this text has been briefly eliminated. A substitute will seem as quickly as attainable during which the rationale for the removing of the article might be specified, or the article might be reinstated.

The paper — isn’t the first to search out the gender impact in surgical procedure — drew a little bit of consideration on social media. Most mentions merely referred to as consideration to the article. However one surgeon, Olga Muldoon, raised questions about the work:



We emailed Barry for remark however haven’t heard again.

Elsevier’s Andrew Davis advised us:

It seems that, quickly after the paper appeared on-line, the journal has obtained a grievance concerning the methodology and the statistics included within the paper. The Editors-in-Chief have determined to briefly take away the Article-in-Press till the investigation is accomplished.


When the investigation might be completed, the AiP might be both reinstated on Science Direct or completely withdrawn.

This text initially appeared on Retraction Watch.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here