About 17% of COVID-19 Survivors Retest Constructive on Observe-Up


Discover the most recent COVID-19 information and steering in Medscape’s Coronavirus Resource Center.

For causes unknown, about 1-in-6 individuals who recovered from COVID-19 subsequently retested constructive not less than 2 weeks later, researchers reported in a examine in Italy.

Sore throat and rhinitis have been the one signs related to a constructive outcome. “Sufferers who continued to have respiratory signs, particularly, have been extra more likely to have a brand new constructive take a look at outcome,” lead writer Francesco Landi, MD, PhD, instructed Medscape Medical Information.

“This means the persistence of respiratory signs shouldn’t be underestimated and must be adequately assessed in all sufferers thought-about recovered from COVID-19,” he mentioned.

“The examine outcomes are fascinating,” Akiko Iwasaki, PhD, an immunobiologist at Yale College and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, instructed Medscape Medical Information. “There are different stories of RNA detection postdischarge, however this examine…discovered that solely two signs out of many — sore throat and rhinitis — have been larger in these with PCR-positive standing.”

The study was revealed on-line September 18 within the American Journal of Preventive Medication.

The findings may carry vital implications for individuals who proceed to be symptomatic. “It’s affordable to be cautious and keep away from shut contact with others, put on a face masks and probably bear an extra nasopharyngeal swab,” mentioned Landi, affiliate professor of inner medication at Catholic College of the Sacred Coronary heart in Rome, Italy.

“Considered one of most fascinating findings is that persistent signs don’t correlate with PCR positivity, suggesting that signs are in lots of circumstances not because of ongoing viral replication,” Jonathan Karn, PhD, professor and chair of the Division of Molecular Biology and Microbiology at Case Western Reserve College College of Medication in Cleveland, Ohio, instructed Medscape Medical Information when requested to remark.

“The important thing technical downside, which they’ve mentioned, is {that a} viral RNA sign within the PCR assay doesn’t essentially imply that infectious virus is current,” Karn mentioned. He added that new complete viral RNA analyses could be wanted to reply this query.

Official COVID-19 Restoration

To determine danger components and COVID-19 survivors extra more likely to retest constructive, Landi and members of the Gemelli In opposition to COVID-19 Publish-Acute Care Examine Group evaluated 131 folks after hospital discharge.

All individuals met World Health Organization criteria for release from isolation, together with two destructive take a look at outcomes not less than 24 hours aside, and have been studied between April 21 and Might 21. Imply age was 56 and 39% have been girls. Solely a barely larger imply BMI of 27.6 kg/m2 within the constructive group, vs 25.9 kg/m2 within the destructive group, was important.

Though 51% of survivors reported fatigue, 44% had dyspnea, and 17% have been coughing, the charges didn’t differ considerably between teams. In distinction, 18% of constructive survivors and 4% of destructive survivors had a sore throat (P = .04), and 27% vs 12%, respectively, reported rhinitis (P = .05).

Folks returned for follow-up visits a imply 17 days after the second destructive swab take a look at.

Asymptomatic COVID-19 Carriers?

“These findings point out {that a} noteworthy fee of recovered sufferers with COVID-19 may nonetheless be asymptomatic carriers of the virus,” the researchers observe within the paper. “Even within the absence of particular tips, the 22 sufferers who examined constructive for COVID-19 once more have been urged to quarantine for a second time.”

No member of the family or shut contact of the constructive survivors reported SARS-CoV-2 an infection. All sufferers continued to put on masks and observe social distancing suggestions, which makes it “very tough to affirm whether or not these sufferers have been actually contagious,” the researchers observe.

Subsequent Steps

Evaluating all COVID-19 survivors to determine any who retest constructive “shall be a vital contribution to a greater understanding of each the pure historical past of COVID-19 in addition to the general public well being implications of viral shedding,” the authors write.

One examine limitation is that the RT-PCR take a look at reveals genetic sequences particular to COVID-19. “It is very important underline that this isn’t a viral tradition and can’t decide whether or not the virus is viable and transmissible,” the researchers observe.

“On this respect, we try to higher perceive if the persistence of long-time constructive RT-PCR take a look at for COVID-19 is absolutely correlated to a possible contagiousness,” they add.

Landi and colleagues mentioned their findings must be thought-about preliminary, and bigger information samples are warranted to validate the outcomes.

Landi and Karn disclosed no related monetary relationships. Iwasaki disclosed a analysis grant from Condair, a 5% or higher fairness curiosity in RIGImmune, and earnings of $250 or extra from PureTec.

Am J Stop Med. Revealed on-line September 18, 2020. Full text

Damian McNamara is a workers journalist based mostly in Miami. He covers a variety of medical specialties, together with infectious illnesses, gastroenterology and rheumatology. Observe Damian on Twitter: @MedReporter.

For extra information, observe Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.